Recently, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio stated in an interview that the United States should consider ‘purchasing’ Greenland to counter strategic expansion by China and Russia in the Arctic region. The remark quickly drew international attention. Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, possesses abundant rare earth minerals and holds significant geopolitical value. In recent years, melting ice due to climate change has increased the island’s strategic importance for shipping routes and resource access. Although Rubio clarified this is not current U.S. government policy, he argued that America should seriously evaluate the possibility of acquiring the island to safeguard national security and resource interests. Historically, the U.S. attempted to buy Greenland from Denmark in 1867 (unsuccessfully) and offered $100 million in 1946—also rejected. Today, amid intensifying great-power competition, such comments resurface, reflecting a renewed U.S. focus on Arctic strategy. However, Greenland’s government has clearly stated it has no intention of being sold, emphasizing its goal of greater autonomy or even full independence—not becoming part of another nation. Experts note that the idea of ‘buying territory’ is virtually unfeasible under modern international law and sovereignty norms, and such statements are largely symbolic, aimed at highlighting the Arctic’s strategic significance and pressuring allies to enhance cooperation.
近日，美国参议员马尔科·鲁比奥（Marco Rubio）在一次采访中表示，美国应考虑‘购买’格陵兰岛，以应对中国和俄罗斯在北极地区的战略扩张。这一言论迅速引发国际关注。格陵兰岛是丹麦的自治领地，拥有丰富的稀土矿产和重要的地缘战略位置，近年来因气候变化导致冰层融化，其航道与资源价值日益凸显。尽管鲁比奥强调这并非当前政府政策，但他认为美国应认真评估获取该岛的可能性，以保障国家安全和资源利益。历史上，美国曾在1867年试图从丹麦手中购买格陵兰岛，但未成功；1946年也曾提出1亿美元的收购报价，同样被拒。如今，随着大国竞争加剧，此类言论再次浮出水面，反映出美国对北极战略重要性的重新评估。然而，格陵兰岛政府已明确表示无意出售，强调其追求的是更大程度的自治乃至独立，而非成为他国领土。专家指出，此类‘购买领土’的设想在当代国际法和主权原则下几乎不可行，更多是一种政治姿态，意在凸显北极地区的重要性并施压盟友加强合作。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/10072.html