In recent years, claims that ‘the United States has withdrawn from 66 international organizations’ have circulated widely on social media and in some media reports. However, this figure is significantly exaggerated and misleading. In reality, since 2017, the U.S. has indeed exited several international agreements and institutions—such as the Paris Climate Agreement, UNESCO, the World Health Organization (WHO, which it later rejoined), and the Iran nuclear deal—but the total number is far fewer than 66.The origin of the ’66’ figure likely conflates various types of international engagements, including treaties, multilateral mechanisms, non-governmental bodies, and observer statuses. As a global power, the U.S. remains deeply involved in hundreds of international organizations and frameworks. Its policy shifts reflect strategic reassessments on specific issues rather than a wholesale retreat from multilateralism. Moreover, some withdrawals were reversed under subsequent administrations—for example, the Biden administration rejoining the Paris Agreement and WHO.Overall, while U.S. foreign policy has experienced fluctuations, it continues to play a significant role within the multilateral system. The public should carefully verify such statistics to avoid misinformation. A nuanced understanding of U.S. engagement with international organizations is essential for accurately assessing evolving global governance dynamics.
近年来，有关‘美国退出66个国际组织’的说法在社交媒体和部分媒体报道中广泛流传。然而，这一数字存在明显夸大和误解。实际上，美国自2017年以来确实退出了若干国际协议与机构，例如《巴黎气候协定》、联合国教科文组织（UNESCO）、世界卫生组织（WHO，后又重新加入）以及《伊朗核协议》等，但总数远未达到66个。所谓‘66个’的来源，可能混淆了‘国际协议’‘多边机制’‘非政府组织’以及‘观察员身份’等多种不同性质的国际参与形式。美国作为全球大国，长期深度参与数百个国际组织与机制，其政策调整更多体现为对特定议题的战略重估，而非全面‘脱钩’。此外，部分退出行为在后续政府更迭后被逆转，如拜登政府重新加入《巴黎协定》和世卫组织。总体而言，美国的外交政策虽有波动，但仍在多边体系中扮演重要角色。公众在接收此类信息时，应审慎核实数据来源，避免被误导。准确理解美国与国际组织的关系，有助于更理性地看待全球治理格局的变化。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/10496.html