Recently, public attention has been drawn to whether judges’ names should be redacted from court judgments. In response, China’s Supreme People’s Court clarified that, under current regulations, court rulings must be made public and include the name of the presiding judge, except in legally stipulated circumstances such as cases involving state secrets, personal privacy, or minors. The Supreme Court emphasized that disclosing judges’ names strengthens judicial accountability, enhances transparency and public trust in the judiciary, and facilitates societal oversight. Addressing concerns about potential risks to judges’ personal safety due to information disclosure, the Court noted that protective mechanisms are already in place to balance public access to information with judges’ security. Furthermore, the Supreme Court reiterated that any threats, intimidation, or retaliatory acts against judges will be dealt with strictly according to law. This stance reflects China’s ongoing commitment to advancing judicial openness and building a transparent, accountable judicial system.
近日，关于裁判文书中是否应隐去法官姓名的问题引发社会关注。最高人民法院对此作出回应，明确表示：根据现行规定，除涉及国家秘密、个人隐私、未成年人保护等法定情形外，裁判文书应当依法公开，并载明承办法官姓名。最高法强调，公开法官姓名有助于强化司法责任制，提升司法透明度和公信力，同时接受社会监督。对于部分公众担忧法官个人信息泄露可能带来的安全风险，最高法指出，法院系统已建立相应保护机制，在保障公众知情权与法官人身安全之间寻求平衡。此外，最高法重申，任何对法官的威胁、恐吓或报复行为都将依法严肃处理。此举体现了我国持续推进司法公开、建设阳光司法体系的决心。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/10500.html