Recently, a primary school in Guangdong province sparked public debate after charging students 250 RMB per month for napping in classrooms during lunch breaks. Parents reported that students who wished to rest at school were required to pay the fee; otherwise, they had to return home. The issue quickly went viral on social media, with many questioning why a basic school facility like a classroom—already funded by public resources—should incur an extra charge.Local education authorities responded that the fee is not mandatory and is intended to cover operational costs such as staff allowances, utilities, and cleaning during the midday supervision period. According to Guangdong provincial guidelines, after-school services may follow a ‘cost-sharing’ model, allowing reasonable fees with parental consent. However, critics argue that linking essential midday rest arrangements to payment could indirectly increase financial burdens on families, particularly those with lower incomes.Experts emphasize the need to clearly distinguish between ‘basic educational services’ and ‘extended care services.’ If midday rest is part of fundamental student welfare and safety provisions, it should be free; additional services like tutoring or enhanced supervision may be offered at a reasonable cost, provided they are transparent and voluntary. The school has temporarily suspended the fee while cooperating with an ongoing investigation. This incident has reignited broader discussions about equity and service boundaries within compulsory education.
近日，广东某小学因在教室内提供午休服务并收取250元/月的托管费用引发社会关注。据家长反映，学校要求学生若需在校午休，必须缴纳该费用，否则只能回家休息。此事迅速在社交媒体上发酵，不少网友质疑：教室本就是学校的公共资源，为何使用还需额外收费？对此，当地教育部门回应称，该费用并非强制收取，而是用于支付午休期间的管理老师补贴、水电及清洁等运营成本。根据广东省相关规定，课后服务可采取‘成本分担’原则，在家长自愿前提下适当收费。但舆论普遍认为，若将基本午休安排与收费挂钩，可能变相增加家庭负担，尤其对低收入群体影响较大。专家指出，学校应明确区分‘基本教育服务’与‘延伸托管服务’。若午休属于保障学生安全的基本安排，不应收费；若提供的是额外照看、辅导等增值服务，则可在透明、自愿基础上合理定价。目前，涉事学校已暂停收费，并配合相关部门进一步核查。此事件也再次引发公众对义务教育阶段服务边界与公平性的讨论。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/11994.html