Recently, the Yunnan Provincial Homestay Association responded to allegations that Ctrip (Trip.com Group) is suspected of monopolistic practices. The association stated it has noted complaints from some homestay operators regarding unfair treatment on Ctrip’s platform, including high commission fees, mandatory participation in promotional campaigns, and opaque traffic allocation mechanisms. The association emphasized its support for a fair and competitive market environment and called on major platforms to respect the legitimate rights and interests of small and medium-sized operators.The Yunnan Homestay Association highlighted that while the homestay sector—serving as a vital bridge between tourists and local accommodations—has grown rapidly in recent years, it also faces increasing risks due to over-reliance on online travel agencies (OTAs). If dominant OTAs abuse their market power, it could stifle innovation, raise operating costs, and ultimately harm both consumers and business owners.The association said it will actively gather feedback from its members and maintain communication with market regulators to promote more transparent and equitable cooperation frameworks. It also encourages homestay operators to diversify their sales channels to reduce dependence on any single platform. While regulators have not yet officially determined whether Ctrip has engaged in monopolistic behavior, the issue has sparked widespread industry discussion about the need for better regulation of platform economies.
近日，云南省民宿协会就携程平台被指涉嫌垄断一事作出回应。协会表示，已关注到部分民宿经营者反映在携程平台上遭遇不公平待遇，包括高额佣金、强制参与促销活动以及流量分配不透明等问题。对此，协会强调支持公平竞争的市场环境，并呼吁相关平台尊重中小经营者的合法权益。云南省民宿协会指出，作为连接游客与本地特色住宿的重要桥梁，民宿行业近年来发展迅速，但也面临平台依赖度过高的风险。若大型在线旅游平台（OTA）滥用市场支配地位，可能抑制行业创新、抬高运营成本，最终损害消费者和经营者的共同利益。协会表示，将积极收集会员反馈，并与市场监管部门保持沟通，推动建立更加透明、公正的合作机制。同时，也鼓励民宿业主多元化渠道运营，降低对单一平台的依赖。目前，相关监管部门尚未就携程是否构成垄断作出正式认定，但此事已引发业内对平台经济规范发展的广泛关注。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/15347.html