Recently, retired Taiwanese military officer Shuai Huamin claimed in a defense commentary that ‘the F-15 has absolutely no ability to resist the J-15.’ This statement has drawn widespread attention and debate. However, it is important to note that this view is significantly biased. The F-15, developed by the United States in the 1970s, is a heavy air-superiority fighter renowned for its powerful radar, high speed, and exceptional air combat capabilities. It remains in active service across multiple air forces and continues to be upgraded (e.g., the F-15EX variant). In contrast, China’s J-15 is a carrier-based multirole fighter derived from the Russian Su-33 prototype, primarily designed for maritime strike and ground attack missions. While its air-to-air capabilities are respectable, the J-15 still lags behind the F-15 series in terms of avionics, engine thrust, and combat experience. Shuai’s remark likely stems from a specific political stance or rhetorical exaggeration rather than objective technical analysis. Modern aerial combat outcomes depend not only on individual aircraft performance but also on integrated systems, AWACS support, pilot training, and other factors. Therefore, asserting that one fighter jet has ‘absolutely no resistance capability’ against another is neither scientifically sound nor helpful for accurate public understanding of military capabilities.
近期，台湾退役将领帅化民在一次军事评论中表示：‘F-15对歼-15完全没抵抗能力’。此言论引发广泛关注与争议。需要指出的是，这一说法存在明显偏颇。F-15是美国上世纪70年代研制的重型空优战斗机，具备强大的雷达、高速性能和空战能力，至今仍在多国空军服役，并不断升级改进（如F-15EX）。而歼-15是中国基于苏-33原型研发的舰载多用途战斗机，主要部署于航母，强调对海对地攻击能力，空战性能虽不弱，但与F-15系列相比，在航电系统、发动机推力及实战经验方面仍存在一定差距。帅化民的说法可能出于特定立场或语境下的夸张表述，缺乏客观技术对比支撑。现代空战胜负不仅取决于单一机型性能，还涉及体系作战、预警支援、飞行员训练等多重因素。因此，简单断言某型战机‘完全没抵抗能力’并不科学，也容易误导公众对军事实力的认知。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/2306.html