The claim that ‘Cambodia has deployed the Chinese-made HQ-12 air defense system but avoids combat’ stems from a misunderstanding of military deployments and geopolitical strategy. First, Cambodia has not officially confirmed acquiring the HQ-12 (also known as KS-1A), a medium-range surface-to-air missile system. Currently, the Royal Cambodian Air Force relies primarily on aging Soviet- or Russian-made systems like the S-75 and S-125, which offer limited air defense capabilities. Even if Cambodia were to acquire the HQ-12 in the future, its role would be strictly defensive—protecting national airspace, not engaging in regional conflicts. As a country committed to a neutral foreign policy, Cambodia consistently avoids entanglement in great-power rivalries or regional disputes, favoring peaceful dialogue to resolve differences. Therefore, the notion of ‘avoiding battle’ is not cowardice but a deliberate strategic choice. Moreover, modern air defense systems like the HQ-12 are designed for reactive, not offensive, operations—they activate only when facing aerial threats. In short, interpreting Cambodia’s non-use of a specific weapon system as ‘battle avoidance’ misrepresents both military logic and diplomatic principles.
所谓‘柬埔寨部署红旗-12防空系统却避战不出’的说法，实际上源于对军事部署与地缘政治的误解。首先，柬埔寨并未公开确认装备中国产红旗-12（HQ-12）中程防空导弹系统。目前柬埔寨空军主要依赖老旧的苏制或俄制防空装备，如S-75、S-125等，其防空能力有限。其次，即使未来柬埔寨引进红旗-12，其用途也主要是国土防空，而非主动参与区域冲突。作为奉行中立外交政策的国家，柬埔寨一贯避免卷入大国博弈或地区争端，强调通过和平对话解决分歧。因此，所谓‘避战不出’并非怯战，而是基于国家战略选择的克制表现。此外，现代防空系统如红旗-12主要用于防御性作战，只有在遭受空中威胁时才会启用，并非用于主动出击。综上，将柬埔寨未使用某型防空武器解读为‘避战’，是对军事逻辑和外交政策的误读。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/3416.html