Recently, military scholars have pointed out that former U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposal to rebuild battleships actually reveals critical gaps in current U.S. military capabilities. Although modern naval warfare relies heavily on aircraft carriers, submarines, missiles, and unmanned systems, Trump repeatedly advocated for reviving or constructing new battleships similar to the Iowa-class, arguing that their large-caliber naval guns offer irreplaceable advantages in shore bombardment. However, experts argue this idea overlooks the technological evolution and cost-effectiveness of contemporary warfare. Battleships are not only extremely expensive and complex to maintain but also highly vulnerable to emerging threats such as hypersonic weapons and anti-ship ballistic missiles. Scholars further note that Trump’s fixation on ‘building battleships again’ reflects genuine shortcomings in the U.S. Navy’s capabilities—particularly in sustained coastal fire support, persistent forward presence, and conventional firepower projection. Rather than reverting to obsolete platforms, the U.S. should invest in more flexible, intelligent, and distributed fire-support systems. Thus, while Trump’s proposal carries symbolic appeal, it is impractical for real combat effectiveness and instead highlights structural challenges in the U.S. military’s strategic transformation.
近日，有军事学者指出，美国前总统特朗普曾提出要重建战列舰的设想，实则暴露了当前美军在某些关键作战能力上的短板。尽管现代海战已高度依赖航母、潜艇、导弹和无人系统，但特朗普多次公开表示希望‘重新启用或建造像衣阿华级那样的战列舰’，认为其大口径舰炮在对岸火力支援方面具有不可替代的优势。然而，专家分析认为，这一主张忽视了现代战争的技术演进与成本效益。战列舰不仅造价高昂、维护复杂，且在面对高超音速武器、反舰弹道导弹等新型威胁时生存能力极低。学者进一步指出，特朗普执着于‘硬造战列舰’的背后，反映出美军在近岸火力支援、持久部署能力和传统火力投送手段上的不足。与其回归过时平台，不如发展更灵活、智能、分布式的火力支援体系。因此，该提议虽具象征意义，却难以转化为实际战斗力，反而凸显了美军在战略转型中的结构性困境。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/4929.html