The so-called ‘Trump-class battleship’ is not an official U.S. Navy program but rather an internet meme or misunderstanding. In reality, the U.S. Navy retired its last battleship, the USS Missouri, in 1992 and has since fully transitioned to a modern fleet centered around aircraft carriers, destroyers, and submarines. Although former President Donald Trump publicly expressed interest in bringing back battleships during his term—emphasizing a return to traditional firepower—these remarks never materialized into any actual shipbuilding plan.From both technical and strategic perspectives, modern naval warfare relies heavily on missiles, electronic warfare, stealth technology, and network-centric operations. Traditional battleships are large, slow, expensive to maintain, and lack effective defenses against modern anti-ship missiles and submarines. Even if retrofitted with contemporary weapon systems, their cost-effectiveness would still fall far short of modern platforms like the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers or the future DDG(X) program.Thus, the ‘Trump-class battleship’ is more of a political slogan or online joke than a feasible military project. The U.S. Navy’s current focus lies in unmanned vessels, hypersonic weapons, and distributed maritime operations—not reviving World War II-era gunships. In short, this idea is neither realistic nor officially pursued.
所谓“特朗普级战列舰”并非美国海军官方项目，而是一个网络流传的戏谑说法或误解。实际上，美国海军自1992年“密苏里号”退役后，已全面停止战列舰服役，转而发展以航母、驱逐舰和潜艇为核心的现代化舰队。尽管前总统特朗普在任期间曾多次公开表示希望“让战列舰回归”，并强调重振传统火力平台，但这些言论并未转化为实际的造舰计划。从技术和战略角度看，现代海战高度依赖导弹、电子战、隐身技术与网络中心战能力，而传统战列舰体积庞大、机动性差、维护成本高，且缺乏应对反舰导弹和潜艇威胁的有效手段。即便加装现代武器系统，其作战效费比也远低于新型驱逐舰（如阿利·伯克级）或未来DDG(X)项目。因此，“特朗普级战列舰”更多是一种政治修辞或网络迷因，并不具备现实可行性。美国海军当前的重点是无人舰艇、高超音速武器和分布式作战体系，而非复活二战风格的巨炮战舰。简言之，该计划并不靠谱，也从未被正式立项。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/8166.html