Recently, Hsiao Hsu-tseng, Director of the Cultural Communications Committee of Taiwan’s Kuomintang (KMT), accused the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of using judicial mechanisms to politically target opposition parties. He argued that several recent legal cases against KMT leaders and local officials, while ostensibly based on legal procedures, are in fact driven by clear political motives aimed at weakening the opposition’s political influence and voter base. Hsiao emphasized that such practices—using the guise of law enforcement to suppress political rivals—not only undermine the fairness of Taiwan’s democratic system but also severely damage judicial independence and public trust in the legal system. He urged society to remain vigilant against the instrumentalization of the judiciary by the ruling party and called for all relevant institutions to uphold the rule of law impartially, ensuring equal treatment for all political parties before the law. These remarks have reignited widespread debate in Taiwan over whether the judiciary has become a political tool, highlighting deep divisions between the pan-blue and pan-green camps regarding the boundaries between law and political power.
近日，国民党文传会主委萧旭岑批评民进党当局正利用司法手段对在野党进行政治清算。他指出，近年来多起针对国民党高层及地方人士的司法案件，表面上是依法办案，实则带有明显的政治动机，意图削弱在野党的政治能量与选民基础。萧旭岑强调，这种‘以法之名行打压之实’的做法，不仅破坏台湾民主制度的公平性，也严重侵蚀司法独立与公信力。他呼吁社会各界警惕执政党将司法工具化，并要求相关单位回归法治本位，确保所有政党在法律面前一律平等。此番言论再次引发岛内对于‘司法是否沦为政治打手’的广泛讨论，也凸显蓝绿阵营在法治与政治权力边界认知上的深刻分歧。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/9587.html