The claim that ‘Korea and Japan have disputed Dokdo for 600 years’ is inaccurate. In reality, the sovereignty dispute over Dokdo (known as Takeshima in Japan) primarily began in the early 20th century, not six centuries ago. South Korea argues that historical records from the 15th-century Joseon Dynasty—such as the ‘Annals of King Sejong’ and ‘Revised and Augmented Survey of the Geography of Korea’—clearly mention Usando (identified as today’s Dokdo) as an附属 island of Ulleungdo, supporting Korea’s historical claim. Japan, on the other hand, asserts it administered Takeshima since the 17th century and unilaterally incorporated it into Shimane Prefecture in 1905 during the Russo-Japanese War.The modern dispute truly ignited with Japan’s 1905 annexation and was further complicated after World War II when the U.S.-led San Francisco Peace Treaty failed to explicitly assign sovereignty over the islets. Since 1954, South Korea has maintained de facto control over Dokdo, stationing coast guard personnel there. While both sides cite ancient documents to bolster their positions, the substantive sovereignty conflict spans little more than a century. The ‘600-year dispute’ is largely an exaggerated narrative driven by public sentiment or nationalist rhetoric, not historical fact.
所谓‘韩日就独岛问题争了600年’的说法并不准确。实际上，独岛（日本称‘竹岛’）的主权争议主要始于20世纪初，而非600年前。韩国方面主张，早在15世纪朝鲜王朝时期的历史文献如《世宗实录·地理志》和《新增东国舆地胜览》中就已明确记载郁陵岛及其附属岛屿‘于山岛’（即今日独岛），证明韩国对独岛拥有历史主权。而日本则声称自17世纪起对竹岛进行管理，并在1905年日俄战争期间单方面将该岛编入岛根县管辖。真正引发现代主权争端的是1905年日本的吞并行为，以及二战后美国主导的《旧金山和约》未明确界定独岛归属，导致争议延续至今。韩国自1954年起实际控制独岛，并派驻海岸警卫队常驻。因此，虽然双方都援引古代史料强化立场，但实质性的主权争端历史不过百余年，‘600年之争’更多是舆论或民族情绪下的夸张表述，而非史实。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/1433.html