Recently, Taiwan’s authorities issued an official directive instructing civil servants to avoid using colloquial or internet slang—such as “lima” (meaning “immediately”), “gao ding” (“sorted out”), and “chao zan” (“awesome”)—in formal government documents. The move has sparked widespread public backlash. While supporters argue that this enhances the professionalism and consistency of official communications, many citizens and commentators have criticized the policy as overly rigid and out of touch with everyday language use, with some even likening it to a form of linguistic censorship. Critics point out that terms like “lima” are widely accepted in both informal and semi-formal contexts, making their prohibition seem unnecessary and impractical. Linguists have also noted that language naturally evolves, and excessive restrictions may hinder effective communication rather than improve it. The controversy highlights the tension between bureaucratic standardization and real-world language dynamics, prompting broader discussions about whether government procedures have become excessively formalistic. Although the relevant agencies have not yet responded to the public outcry, the issue continues to trend on social media as a focal point in debates over linguistic freedom and administrative efficiency.
近日，台湾地区有关部门发布公文，要求公务人员在正式文件中避免使用“立马”“搞定”“超赞”等口语化或网络用语，引发社会广泛争议。支持者认为此举有助于维护公文的严谨性与专业性，确保政府文书的规范统一；但更多民众和舆论则批评该规定过于僵化、脱离现实，甚至被讥为“文字狱”。有网民指出，“立马”作为常用中文词汇，在日常沟通乃至部分正式场合早已普遍使用，将其列为禁用词显得不合时宜。此外，也有语言学者表示，语言是活的，应随时代演进而包容变化，过度限制反而削弱沟通效率。此事件反映出公共行政在语言规范与实际使用之间的张力，也引发对官僚体系是否过于形式主义的反思。目前，相关单位尚未就舆论反弹作出进一步回应，但该议题已在社交媒体持续发酵，成为公众讨论语言自由与行政效率的热点话题。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/14517.html