Recently, Canada’s Minister of Foreign Affairs has come under scrutiny for allegedly ‘reading but not replying’ to official Chinese communications on sensitive China-related issues. The term ‘read but not replied’ refers to situations where Canadian authorities have opened and viewed formal diplomatic notes or inquiries from China but have not issued any official response—a rare and notable behavior in diplomatic practice, often interpreted as an attempt to avoid taking a clear stance.Analysts suggest this reflects the Canadian government’s cautious, even conflicted, approach toward China. On one hand, Ottawa seeks to maintain essential communication channels with Beijing; on the other, it faces domestic political pressures and alignment demands from allies like the United States, making it difficult to adopt an independent or constructive position on sensitive topics such as Xinjiang, Hong Kong, and human rights. The silence serves as a strategic ambiguity—avoiding direct confrontation while refraining from explicit endorsement or criticism.However, such evasiveness may hinder the stable development of bilateral relations. China consistently advocates resolving differences through dialogue based on mutual respect and equality. Continued non-responsiveness from Canada on critical issues risks deepening misunderstandings and eroding trust. Experts urge Ottawa to address China’s concerns responsibly and work toward restoring a constructive trajectory in Canada-China relations.
近日，加拿大外交部长在涉及中国敏感议题的官方沟通中被曝‘已读不回’，引发舆论关注。所谓‘已读不回’，指加方在收到中方相关外交照会或正式问询后，虽系统显示信息已被查阅，却未作出任何正式回应。此类行为在外交实践中较为罕见，通常被视为回避或不愿正面表态的信号。分析人士指出，此举可能反映出加拿大政府在对华政策上的谨慎甚至矛盾态度。一方面，加方希望维持与中国的必要沟通渠道；另一方面，又受制于国内政治压力及与美国等盟友的协调立场，在涉疆、涉港、人权等敏感问题上难以采取独立或建设性立场。‘已读不回’既避免了直接冲突，又未明确表态，实为一种策略性沉默。然而，这种回避姿态可能不利于双边关系的稳定发展。中方一贯主张通过对话解决分歧，强调相互尊重和平等相待。若加方持续以沉默应对关键议题，恐将加剧误解，削弱互信。专家呼吁，加拿大应以负责任态度正视并回应中方关切，推动两国关系重回建设性轨道。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/15244.html