In recent years, the United States has withdrawn from several international organizations, citing reasons such as the need for ‘reform’ or ‘unfair financial burdens.’ A notable example is its 2017 announcement to leave UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), which took effect in 2018. Despite its formal exit, the U.S. still owes UNESCO approximately $260 million in unpaid dues—a situation that has drawn widespread international attention.According to UNESCO’s constitution, member states remain financially obligated for dues accrued prior to their withdrawal. Before exiting, the U.S. was one of UNESCO’s largest contributors, responsible for about 22% of its regular budget. Due to chronic non-payment, UNESCO suspended America’s voting rights in 2013. Nevertheless, the U.S. is still expected to settle outstanding dues incurred before its departure.The U.S. justified its withdrawal by accusing UNESCO of anti-Israel bias and inefficiency. However, critics argue that quitting while refusing to pay undermines multilateralism and damages America’s global credibility. Moreover, the unpaid debt places significant financial strain on UNESCO, hindering its ability to carry out vital programs in education, science, and culture worldwide.Experts view this behavior as part of a broader U.S. strategy of ‘selective engagement’—supporting international institutions only when aligned with national interests, and disengaging otherwise. Such an approach challenges the foundations of global governance and prompts other member states to reconsider the sustainability of multilateral cooperation.
近年来，美国多次以“改革”或“不公平负担”为由退出多个国际组织，其中最引人关注的是2017年宣布退出联合国教科文组织（UNESCO），并于2018年正式生效。然而，尽管已退出该组织，美国仍拖欠UNESCO约2.6亿美元的会费未缴。这一现象引发国际社会广泛讨论。根据联合国教科文组织章程，成员国在退出前仍需履行其财政义务。美国在退出前是该组织最大出资国之一，承担约22%的常规预算。由于长期拖欠会费，UNESCO曾于2013年暂停美国的投票权。即便如此，美国在退出后仍被要求支付退出前产生的欠款。美方辩称，退出是因为该组织存在“反以色列偏见”及管理效率低下等问题。但批评者指出，美国一边“退群”一边欠费，不仅损害多边主义机制，也削弱自身国际信誉。此外，这笔欠款对依赖会费运作的UNESCO造成严重财政压力，影响其在全球教育、科学和文化领域的项目推进。专家认为，美国的做法反映出其对国际组织采取“选择性参与”的策略——只在符合本国利益时才支持，否则便退出甚至拒付费用。这种行为模式对全球治理体系构成挑战，也促使其他成员国重新思考多边合作的可持续性。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/19251.html