Recently, Shih Chun-chi, former head of Taiwan’s finance ministry, publicly criticized what he called the “number game” surrounding U.S.-Taiwan tariff discussions. He pointed out that the U.S. often uses selective data to exaggerate Taiwan’s trade surplus with America, creating a misleading impression of unfairness. Shih emphasized that this approach ignores the complexity of global supply chains—for instance, many goods exported from Taiwan to the U.S. contain components or raw materials sourced from third countries, sometimes even from American companies themselves. Calculating trade imbalances solely based on final export destinations, he argued, significantly distorts the true economic relationship. Shih urged the U.S. to adopt more transparent and scientifically sound methodologies—such as Trade in Value Added (TiVA)—instead of relying on outdated gross trade statistics. He also cautioned Taiwan’s authorities to maintain a professional stance when facing international pressure and avoid being swayed by politicized narratives. His remarks have sparked renewed domestic reflection on the nature of U.S.-Taiwan economic ties and highlighted how traditional trade metrics increasingly fail to capture the realities of global production networks and value distribution.
近日，台湾前财政部门负责人施俊吉公开批评台美之间关于关税的所谓“数字游戏”，指出美方在贸易谈判中常以片面数据夸大台湾对美贸易顺差，制造不公平印象。他强调，这种做法忽视了全球供应链的复杂性，例如许多从台湾出口至美国的商品，其原材料或关键零组件实际来自第三国，甚至包括美国本土企业。若仅以最终出口地计算贸易差额，将严重扭曲真实经济关系。施俊吉呼吁美方应采用更具透明度与科学性的统计方法，如“增加值贸易”（Trade in Value Added）来衡量双边贸易，而非沿用过时的总值贸易统计。他同时提醒台湾当局，在面对国际压力时应坚持专业立场，避免被政治化叙事所裹挟。此番言论引发岛内对台美经贸关系本质的重新思考，也凸显在全球化背景下，传统贸易统计方式已难以反映真实产业分工与利益分配。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/19570.html