Recently, a news story about a woman who had her uterus removed due to an ectopic pregnancy and was subsequently sued for divorce by her husband—who also demanded the return of the betrothal gift (commonly known as ‘bride price’)—has sparked widespread public concern. According to reports, shortly after marriage, the woman suffered a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy requiring emergency surgery that resulted in a hysterectomy, leaving her infertile. Her husband then filed for divorce citing her inability to bear children and requested the return of the bride price paid before the wedding. The court ultimately ruled that part of the bride price should be returned, reasoning that the couple had cohabited for only a short period and had no children.This case highlights deep-seated societal biases regarding women’s value and marital relationships. Treating a woman’s fertility as the cornerstone of marriage disregards her dignity and rights as an independent individual—a regressive mindset. Moreover, in some regions, the traditional bride price custom has been distorted into a transactional element of marriage, exacerbating gender inequality. While Chinese law permits the return of bride price under specific circumstances, greater emphasis should be placed on protecting vulnerable parties, especially women who lose reproductive capacity due to medical reasons.The public is calling for clearer legal guidelines prohibiting unilateral divorce and bride price restitution solely based on a woman’s physiological condition, alongside broader social efforts to promote equal and respectful views of marriage.
近日，一则‘女子因宫外孕切除子宫后遭丈夫起诉离婚并被索要彩礼’的新闻引发社会广泛关注。据报道，该女子在婚后不久因宫外孕导致生命危险，不得不接受子宫切除手术，失去生育能力。随后，其丈夫以‘无法生育’为由提出离婚，并要求返还婚前支付的彩礼。法院最终判决部分彩礼需返还，理由是双方共同生活时间较短且未育有子女。此事件折射出当前社会对女性价值与婚姻关系的深层偏见。将女性生育能力视为婚姻核心条件，忽视其作为独立个体的权利与尊严，是一种落后观念。同时，彩礼制度在部分地区异化为‘交易式婚姻’的工具，加剧了性别不平等。法律虽规定特定情形下可返还彩礼，但应更注重保护弱势方，尤其是因健康原因丧失生育能力的女性。公众呼吁完善相关法律解释，明确不得因女方生理原因单方面解除婚姻并索回彩礼，同时推动移风易俗，倡导平等、尊重的婚姻观。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/19641.html