Recently, a legal case involving false advertising has drawn widespread attention: a social media influencer fabricated and published unsubstantiated claims that the Fangcheng Bao (a Chinese SUV brand) consumes 18 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers—without conducting any actual testing. This misinformation damaged the brand’s reputation and led to a decline in sales. The court ruled that the influencer’s actions constituted commercial disparagement and unfair competition, ordering them to pay RMB 2.01 million in compensation for economic losses and reasonable legal expenses. The case highlights the boundaries of responsibility in online content creation: even individual accounts can be held legally liable if they publish unverified, misleading information that causes tangible harm to a company’s reputation. The court emphasized that consumers have the right to accurate and objective product information, and content creators must base their reviews or evaluations on facts and integrity—not fabricate data or exaggerate negative aspects solely for clicks or engagement. This ruling not only supports automakers in defending their rights but also serves as a warning to the influencer community about the legal responsibilities that accompany freedom of speech.
近日，一起因虚假宣传引发的法律纠纷引发广泛关注：某自媒体博主在未进行实际测试的情况下，编造并发布‘方程豹汽车百公里油耗高达18升’的不实信息，导致该品牌声誉受损、销量下滑。法院经审理认定，该博主的行为构成商业诋毁和不正当竞争，判决其赔偿方程豹所属公司经济损失及合理维权费用共计201万元。此案凸显了网络时代信息传播的责任边界——即便是个人账号，若发布未经核实、具有误导性的内容，且对他人商誉造成实质损害，同样需承担法律责任。法院强调，消费者有权获取真实、客观的产品信息，而内容创作者在发表评论或测评时，应基于事实、遵循诚信原则，不得以博取流量为目的捏造数据或夸大负面效果。该判决不仅为车企维权提供了司法支持，也为自媒体行业敲响了警钟，提醒公众在享受言论自由的同时，必须恪守法律底线。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/19818.html