In October 2022, the Biden administration released its updated National Defense Strategy (NDS), explicitly identifying China as the ‘pacing challenge’ and mentioning Taiwan multiple times, underscoring the importance of maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. In contrast, the Trump administration’s 2018 NDS—the only official defense strategy report issued during his term (2017–2021)—did not mention ‘Taiwan’ even once, a fact that has drawn significant analytical attention.Observers note that while the Trump administration actively strengthened U.S.-Taiwan ties through increased arms sales and high-level unofficial exchanges, it deliberately avoided referencing Taiwan in formal strategic documents. This omission may have reflected a desire to manage overall U.S.-China relations cautiously or to avoid provoking Beijing unnecessarily. The 2018 report primarily framed U.S. defense priorities around ‘great power competition,’ labeling China and Russia as principal strategic competitors but focusing on military capabilities and global influence rather than specific flashpoints like Taiwan.By comparison, the Biden administration’s explicit inclusion of Taiwan in strategic documents signals a shift toward a more confrontational and containment-oriented approach toward China. The Trump-era silence on Taiwan in official defense strategy highlights a pragmatic yet ambiguous China policy and illustrates the differing rhetorical and strategic styles between successive U.S. administrations.
2022年10月，美国拜登政府发布了新版《国防战略报告》（National Defense Strategy），其中明确将中国视为“首要挑战”，并多次提及台湾，强调维护台海和平稳定的重要性。然而，回溯至特朗普政府时期（2017–2021年），其官方发布的《国防战略报告》（2018年版）全文未出现“台湾”（Taiwan）一词。这一现象引发外界广泛关注与解读。分析指出，特朗普政府虽在实际行动上强化对台军售、提升美台非官方关系，但在战略文件中刻意避免直接点名台湾，可能是出于对中美关系整体框架的谨慎考量，或为避免激化与北京的紧张局势。此外，2018年报告更侧重于“大国竞争”概念，将中国和俄罗斯定位为主要战略竞争对手，但聚焦于军事能力和全球影响力层面，未深入涉及具体地缘热点如台湾问题。相比之下，拜登政府在战略文件中更明确地将台湾纳入印太安全架构，反映出美国对华战略从“竞争为主”向“遏制加围堵”演进的趋势。特朗普时期“提中国不提台湾”的做法，体现了其务实但模糊的对华策略，也凸显了不同政府在战略表述上的风格差异。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/21422.html