Recently, media reports suggested that the U.S. government was considering promoting a so-called ‘C5’ (China Five) framework—leveraging the Five Eyes alliance (comprising the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, and New Zealand)—to further coordinate strategy toward China. In response, the White House swiftly denied any intention to establish such a ‘C5’ grouping. A White House spokesperson emphasized that the administration’s current diplomatic priority is strengthening existing alliances and partnerships, not creating new exclusionary mechanisms. This statement aims to alleviate concerns about accelerated Western efforts to ‘decouple from’ or ‘contain’ China.Analysts note that while the Five Eyes nations have increasingly voiced coordinated positions on China-related issues in recent years, internal divisions remain over how to approach Beijing. For instance, New Zealand and Canada maintain robust economic ties with China and are reluctant to fully align with Washington’s tougher stance. The White House’s denial of forming a ‘C5’ reflects both a response to international perceptions and an effort to balance strategic competition with China against the need for multilateral cooperation. Going forward, the U.S. is more likely to advance its objectives through existing frameworks like the Indo-Pacific Strategy and the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD), rather than establishing new structures.
近日，有媒体报道称美国政府正考虑推动组建所谓‘C5’（China Five）机制，以联合五个英语国家（即美、英、加、澳、新组成的‘五眼联盟’）进一步协调对华战略。对此，白宫迅速作出回应，明确否认有意组建‘C5’。白宫发言人强调，美国当前的外交重点是加强现有联盟与伙伴关系，而非创建新的排他性机制。这一表态意在缓和外界对美西方阵营加速‘脱钩’或‘围堵中国’的担忧。分析人士指出，尽管‘五眼联盟’近年来在涉华议题上频繁发声，但其内部在对华政策上仍存在分歧。例如，新西兰和加拿大在经贸合作方面与中国保持密切往来，不愿完全追随美国强硬立场。白宫此次否认组建‘C5’，既是对国际舆论的回应，也反映出美国试图在遏制中国与维持多边合作之间寻求平衡。未来，美国更可能通过既有机制如‘印太战略’、‘四方安全对话’（QUAD）等推进其战略目标，而非另起炉灶。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/2593.html