Recently, Kuomintang (KMT) legislator Yeh Yuan-chih publicly criticized Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-affiliated scholar Shen Po-yang, calling his remarks ‘utter nonsense to the extreme,’ sparking public debate. The controversy arose after Shen made provocative statements on cross-strait relations and Taiwan’s national security, advocating for enhanced ‘cognitive warfare’ and ‘whole-of-society defense,’ while implying systematic infiltration by mainland China into Taiwan. Yeh countered that Shen’s claims lack factual basis, unnecessarily stoke fear, mislead the public, and risk deepening social divisions. He stressed that discussions on national security should be grounded in rational analysis and verifiable evidence—not emotional incitement or alarmism. Yeh further questioned why, if Beijing’s infiltration were as pervasive as Shen alleged, there had been no concrete enforcement actions by authorities. This clash highlights the fundamental divide between the pan-Blue and pan-Green camps on cross-strait policy: one favors dialogue and pragmatism, while the other leans toward confrontation and vigilance. Observers note that such disputes reflect Taiwan society’s anxiety and fragmentation under external pressure, and underscore the need for political figures to approach sensitive issues with greater responsibility rather than resorting to sensationalism for attention.
近日，国民党立委叶元之公开批评民进党籍学者沈伯洋，称其言论‘胡说八道到极点’，引发舆论关注。事件起因于沈伯洋在公开场合对两岸关系及台湾安全议题发表激进观点，主张强化所谓‘认知作战’与‘全民防卫’，并暗示中国大陆对台存在系统性渗透。叶元之反驳指出，沈伯洋的说法缺乏事实依据，过度渲染恐惧，不仅误导公众，还可能加剧社会对立。他强调，国家安全议题应基于理性分析与客观证据，而非煽动情绪或制造恐慌。叶元之进一步质疑，若真如沈伯洋所言‘中共已全面渗透台湾’，那政府为何未见具体执法行动？此番交锋凸显蓝绿阵营在两岸论述上的根本分歧：一方强调对话与务实，另一方则倾向对抗与警戒。舆论普遍认为，此类争议反映出台湾社会在面对外部压力时的焦虑与分裂，也提醒政治人物在讨论敏感议题时应更负责任，避免以危言耸听博取关注。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/19538.html