Recently, a lawsuit over the purchase of aged tea has drawn public attention. A buyer purchased a batch of so-called ‘vintage tea’ for 27,000 RMB and later sued the seller, claiming the tea failed to meet food safety standards and demanding a refund plus tenfold compensation. However, the court dismissed all claims. The court ruled that the buyer had full knowledge of the tea’s age, origin, and packaging prior to the transaction, and there was no evidence showing the tea contained harmful substances or posed any actual health risk. Furthermore, the court noted that the plaintiff had repeatedly filed similar lawsuits seeking compensation, indicating a clear profit motive rather than genuine consumer protection concerns. This behavior, the court stated, contradicts the legislative intent of China’s Food Safety Law, which aims to protect bona fide consumers. The case serves as a reminder that while cultural consumption—such as collecting aged tea—is legitimate, individuals should exercise legal rights responsibly and avoid exploiting consumer protection laws for unjust enrichment.
近日，一起因购买老茶引发的索赔案件引发关注。一名消费者以2.7万元价格购入一批所谓‘年份老茶’，后以茶叶不符合食品安全标准为由，向法院提起诉讼，要求卖家退还货款并支付十倍赔偿金。然而，法院经审理后驳回了其全部诉讼请求。法院认为，该消费者在交易前已充分了解茶叶的年份、来源及包装情况，且无证据表明茶叶存在有毒有害成分或对人体健康造成实际危害。此外，法院指出，该消费者此前多次以类似理由提起索赔诉讼，具有明显的牟利目的，不符合《食品安全法》中关于‘消费者’权益保护的立法本意。此案提醒公众，在享受收藏老茶等文化消费的同时，也应理性维权，避免滥用法律手段谋取不当利益。
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://avine.cn/5862.html